Pell jury should have had doubt: court

By Karen Sweeney
Updated April 7 2020 - 5:08pm, first published 5:02pm
The High Court says there wasn't sufficient evidence to exclude doubt of Cardinal Pell's guilt.
The High Court says there wasn't sufficient evidence to exclude doubt of Cardinal Pell's guilt.

Seven of Australia's top legal minds have ruled the jury which convicted Cardinal George Pell should have found there was reasonable doubt about the sexual abuse charges he faced.

Get the latest St George news in your inbox

Sign up for our newsletter to stay up to date.

We care about the protection of your data. Read our Privacy Policy.